Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Psiphon Conduit vs Tunnelblick

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Psiphon Conduit

7.5
Security & Privacy

Psiphon network proxy tool

Tunnelblick

7.0
Security & Privacy

Free and open-source OpenVPN client

Metric Psiphon Conduit Tunnelblick
Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
AI Score 7.5 7.0
30-day Installs 5 1.2K
90-day Installs 34 3.5K
365-day Installs 34 13.6K
Version 1.8.0-RC.2 8.0.1,6301
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 216 3.2K
GitHub Forks 75 355
Open Issues 7 62
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Language TypeScript Objective-C
Last GitHub Commit 2mo ago 3mo ago
First Seen Feb 11, 2026 May 21, 2013

Reviews

Psiphon Conduit

Psiphon Conduit is a network proxy tool designed to help users access blocked content by routing traffic through a global network of nodes. It provides a focus on privacy and circumventing censorship, making it particularly useful for users in regions with restricted internet access.

Psiphon Conduit acts as a network proxy to help users access content that may be blocked in their region.

Pros

  • + Open-source with a GPL-3.0 license, promoting transparency and community contribution.
  • + Supports multiple platforms including macOS, Linux, and Android.
  • + Focus on privacy and censorship circumvention.

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for updates.
  • - Recent history of connection stability issues, though resolved.

Tunnelblick

Tunnelblick is a reliable, free, and open-source OpenVPN client for macOS, offering users a secure and versatile way to connect to VPN servers. Its long-standing presence and active maintenance make it a trusted choice for those seeking a robust VPN solution.

Tunnelblick allows users to establish secure VPN connections using OpenVPN technology.

Pros

  • + Free and open-source, promoting transparency and cost-effectiveness.
  • + Long-standing and actively maintained, ensuring reliability and security.
  • + Versatile configuration options for various VPN needs.

Cons

  • - Historical security vulnerabilities, though addressed, may raise concerns.
  • - Complex configuration process for some users.