Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

ProcessMonitor vs osquery

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

ProcessMonitor

7.0
Security & Privacy

Monitor process activity

osquery

8.5
Security & Privacy

SQL powered operating system instrumentation and analytics

Metric ProcessMonitor osquery
Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
AI Score 7.0 8.5
30-day Installs 11 266
90-day Installs 69 801
365-day Installs 233 2.8K
Version 1.5.0 5.23.0
Auto-updates No No
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 494 23.2K
GitHub Forks 72 2.6K
Open Issues 6 660
License GPL-3.0 NOASSERTION
Language Objective-C C++
Last GitHub Commit 2y ago 1mo ago
First Seen Aug 9, 2023 Jun 18, 2020

Reviews

ProcessMonitor

ProcessMonitor is a macOS utility that provides real-time monitoring of process activity, helping users identify unusual behavior. It's particularly useful for developers and security professionals who need detailed insights into system processes.

Monitors and analyzes real-time process activity on macOS to help identify unusual behavior.

Pros

  • + Provides real-time process monitoring and analysis.
  • + Integration with Apple's Endpoint Security Framework adds credibility and functionality.
  • + Open-source under GPL-3.0, allowing for transparency and customization.

Cons

  • - Lack of auto-updates may result in missed features or security patches.
  • - Requires disabling System Integrity Protection (SIP) for full functionality, which could be a security concern.

osquery

Osquery uniquely enables users to query operating system data using SQL, providing powerful insights for system monitoring, security, and analytics. It supports cross-platform operation and real-time monitoring, benefiting system administrators, developers, and security professionals.

Osquery allows users to query operating system data using SQL, providing insights and monitoring capabilities.

Pros

  • + Cross-platform support
  • + Powerful SQL-based querying
  • + Real-time monitoring capabilities
  • + Open-source with active community

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature
  • - Complex setup for some users
  • - High number of open issues