Planet vs RustDesk
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Planet
7.0Decentralised blogs and websites powered by IPFS and Ethereum Name System
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
| Metric | Planet | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 22 | 2.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 47 | 8.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 189 | 21.3K |
| Version | 0.22.1 | 1.4.6 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.7K | 109.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 71 | 16.2K |
| Open Issues | 78 | 99 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 15, 2022 | May 28, 2022 |
Reviews
Planet
Planet is a decentralized blogging and website platform powered by IPFS and Ethereum Name System, offering a unique way to host content on the blockchain. It's ideal for developers and content creators who value privacy and decentralization.
Planet allows users to create and host decentralized blogs and websites using IPFS and Ethereum Name System.
Pros
- + Uses cutting-edge blockchain technology for decentralization
- + Easy-to-use interface for hosting blogs and websites
- + Actively developed with regular updates
Cons
- - Limited user base and niche appeal
- - Some reported bugs and technical issues
- - Requires understanding of blockchain concepts
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates