Paseo vs Codex
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Paseo
7.0Self-hosted daemon for AI coding agents
Codex
8.0OpenAI's Codex desktop app for managing coding agents
| Metric | Paseo | Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 538 | 7.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 621 | 18.6K |
| 365-day Installs | 621 | 19.9K |
| Version | 0.1.69 | 26.429.61741 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 196 | 64.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 16 | 8.6K |
| Open Issues | 16 | 1.8K |
| License | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Mar 7, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Reviews
Paseo
Paseo is a self-hosted daemon designed to manage AI coding agents, allowing users to control them remotely from various devices. It offers cross-platform management capabilities, making it ideal for developers seeking to oversee AI tools independently.
Paseo serves as a self-hosted daemon that enables remote management of AI coding agents across different devices.
Pros
- + Self-hosted, providing control over data and infrastructure.
- + Enables remote management across multiple platforms.
- + Active development with recent updates.
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may lead to maintenance issues.
- - Low adoption with only 31 installs in the last 30 days.
Codex
Codex is OpenAI's desktop app for managing coding agents, offering real-time code analysis and terminal integration. It's a lightweight tool for developers to enhance coding efficiency.
Manages coding agents with features like real-time code analysis and terminal integration.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient
- + Seamless terminal integration
- + Real-time code analysis
- + Customizable for user needs
- + Actively developed with frequent updates
Cons
- - Sign-in issues reported by some users
- - Occasional routing problems to older versions