Parallels Client vs Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Parallels Client
6.0RDP client
Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS
8.0Client for VM agents and remote workstation cards
| Metric | Parallels Client | Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | System Tools |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 53 | 6 |
| 90-day Installs | 176 | 16 |
| 365-day Installs | 704 | 53 |
| Version | 19.4.3,25221 | 26.01.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | - | — |
| GitHub Forks | - | — |
| Open Issues | - | — |
| License | NOASSERTION | — |
| Language | Shell | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 10mo ago | — |
| First Seen | Feb 14, 2018 | Aug 20, 2020 |
Reviews
Parallels Client
Parallels Client is a reliable RDP client designed for seamless remote desktop connections. It integrates with Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) and offers features like remote session management. Ideal for users needing remote access to desktops or applications.
Connects to remote desktops and applications using the RDP protocol.
Pros
- + Reliable and integrates well with Parallels RAS
- + Recent updates indicate active maintenance
- + Useful for remote desktop and application access
Cons
- - Manual updates required
- - Limited GitHub activity and community engagement
Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS
The Teradici PCoIP Software Client enables high-performance remote access to virtual machines and remote workstations, making it ideal for professionals who need seamless connectivity to enterprise resources. It supports advanced remote computing scenarios, ensuring a smooth experience for users in fields requiring intensive graphical or computational tasks.
Connects to remote VMs and workstations for high-performance remote computing.
Pros
- + High-performance remote access capabilities.
- + Essential for professionals needing to connect to enterprise VMs or remote workstations.
- + Supports advanced graphical and computational tasks.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual updates.
- - Primarily designed for enterprise use, limiting its appeal to individual users.