OpenList Desktop vs Cyberduck
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
OpenList Desktop
7.0Desktop application for OpenList
Cyberduck
8.0Server and cloud storage browser
| Metric | OpenList Desktop | Cyberduck |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud & Storage | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 14 | 2.6K |
| 90-day Installs | 55 | 8.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 113 | 29.3K |
| Version | 0.9.0 | 9.4.1,44384 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 943 | 4.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 48 | 339 |
| Open Issues | 25 | 508 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Vue | Java |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Feb 11, 2026 | Oct 3, 2012 |
Reviews
OpenList Desktop
OpenList Desktop provides a user-friendly interface for interacting with OpenList, offering features like file management and integration with services like rclone. It benefits users who need a desktop presence for OpenList, particularly those managing files across multiple services.
Provides a desktop interface for OpenList, allowing users to interact with their files and services directly from their computer.
Pros
- + Open-source under GPL-3.0, appealing to developers who prefer copyleft licenses.
- + Integration with rclone for cloud storage management.
- + User-friendly interface for file management and service interaction.
Cons
- - Beta status with potential bugs, such as issues with starting the core and performance problems on Mac arm64.
- - Dependency on rclone, which may require additional setup and management.
Cyberduck
Cyberduck is a versatile file transfer client supporting multiple protocols and cloud services, making it ideal for developers and sysadmins.
Cyberduck allows users to browse and manage files on servers and cloud storage using various protocols.
Pros
- + Supports multiple protocols and cloud services
- + Open-source with a large community
- + Cross-platform support
Cons
- - UI issues and bugs on older macOS versions
- - Some users find the interface unintuitive