Keeper Password Manager vs 1Password
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Keeper Password Manager
6.0Password manager application and digital vault
1Password
8.0Password manager that keeps all passwords secure behind one password
| Metric | Keeper Password Manager | 1Password |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 109 | 5.9K |
| 90-day Installs | 423 | 17.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.4K | 56.0K |
| Version | 17.6.0 | 8.12.12 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | - | 648 |
| GitHub Forks | - | 253 |
| Open Issues | - | 209 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | — | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5mo ago | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | Mar 26, 2017 | Dec 11, 2014 |
Reviews
Keeper Password Manager
Keeper Password Manager is a robust password manager and digital vault designed for secure password storage and management. It offers enterprise-level security features and cross-platform support, making it ideal for users seeking a reliable and comprehensive password management solution.
Keeper Password Manager securely stores and manages passwords, and acts as a digital vault for sensitive information.
Pros
- + High security features
- + Digital vault functionality
- + Cross-platform support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Inactive GitHub repository
1Password
1Password is a leading password manager that securely stores and organizes all your passwords behind a single master password. It offers features like password generation, autofill, and secure sharing, making it ideal for individuals and teams seeking robust password management. Its cross-platform support and integration with various services enhance its usability for a wide range of users.
1Password securely manages and organizes passwords, allowing users to access all accounts with a single master password.
Pros
- + Robust security features and password management capabilities.
- + Cross-platform support and seamless integration with various services.
- + Community support with a strong presence on GitHub and active development.
Cons
- - Subscription model without local vaults may not suit all users.
- - High number of open issues on GitHub suggests potential maintenance concerns.