Iris vs Vivid
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Iris
8.0Blue light filter and eye protection software
Vivid
7.0Adaptive brightness for displays
| Metric | Iris | Vivid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 8 | 42 |
| 90-day Installs | 18 | 102 |
| 365-day Installs | 77 | 352 |
| Version | 1.2.2 | 2.18.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 25.6K | 2.2K |
| GitHub Forks | 2.5K | 99 |
| Open Issues | 145 | 24 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 27, 2017 | Apr 18, 2022 |
Reviews
Iris
Iris is a blue light filtering software designed to protect eyes from screen strain, offering customizable settings and scheduling features. It's ideal for users who spend extended periods in front of screens, providing a simple yet effective solution for eye health.
Filters blue light and adjusts screen brightness according to time and user preferences.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive BSD-3-Clause license
- + Effective eye protection features against blue light
- + Customizable filtering options and scheduling
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Limited community discussion outside GitHub
Vivid
Vivid offers adaptive brightness control for macOS displays, automatically adjusting based on ambient light and usage. It benefits users seeking seamless brightness management without manual adjustments.
Automatically adjusts display brightness based on ambient light and usage patterns.
Pros
- + Provides automatic brightness adjustments for user convenience.
- + Helps reduce eye strain by adapting to lighting conditions.
- + Possibly offers customization options for brightness settings.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality.
- - Limited installs suggest it may not be widely adopted.