IPFS Desktop vs RustDesk
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
IPFS Desktop
8.0Menu bar application for the IPFS peer-to-peer network
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
| Metric | IPFS Desktop | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Communication |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 36 | 2.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 125 | 8.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 538 | 21.2K |
| Version | 0.49.0 | 1.4.6 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 6.5K | 109.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 905 | 16.2K |
| Open Issues | 139 | 99 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Mar 17, 2019 | May 28, 2022 |
Reviews
IPFS Desktop
IPFS Desktop is a user-friendly menu bar application that simplifies interaction with the IPFS peer-to-peer network. It provides seamless access to decentralized storage and file management, making it ideal for developers and early adopters of decentralized technologies.
IPFS Desktop integrates with the IPFS network, enabling users to interact with decentralized storage directly from their menu bar.
Pros
- + User-friendly interface for interacting with IPFS
- + Menu bar integration for easy access
- + Supports decentralized storage and file management
Cons
- - Lack of extensive community discussion
- - Privacy concerns regarding telemetry
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates