GraphiQL App vs Bruno
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
GraphiQL App
7.5Light, Electron-based Wrapper around GraphiQL
Bruno
8.5Open source IDE for exploring and testing APIs
| Metric | GraphiQL App | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 80 | 5.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 246 | 17.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.7K | 88.9K |
| Version | 0.7.2 | 3.3.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 3.0K | 41.6K |
| GitHub Forks | 331 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 87 | 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Feb 6, 2016 | Feb 24, 2023 |
Reviews
GraphiQL App
GraphiQL App is a lightweight macOS tool for developers working with GraphQL, offering a dedicated GUI for querying and exploring GraphQL APIs. It's built using Electron and provides a simple interface for efficient API testing and development.
GraphiQL App provides a graphical user interface for querying and exploring GraphQL APIs, allowing developers to test and debug their GraphQL queries effectively.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient interface for GraphQL development
- + Built with Electron, ensuring a smooth and responsive user experience
- + Active development with recent updates
Cons
- - Lack of auto-update feature may inconvenience some users
- - Some open issues, such as segmentation faults and compatibility problems, need addressing
Bruno
Bruno is an open-source IDE for exploring and testing APIs, offering a fast and Git-friendly alternative to tools like Postman and Insomnia. It's ideal for developers who value performance, integration with version control, and a lightweight API testing experience.
Bruno provides a platform for developers to explore, test, and document APIs efficiently.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT licensed, offering flexibility and transparency.
- + Git-friendly with support for version control integration.
- + Fast performance and lightweight compared to alternatives.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Strong community support and active development.
Cons
- - A steep learning curve due to its open-source nature.
- - A large number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention.