Fetch vs ForkLift
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fetch
8.0File transfer client
ForkLift
8.0Finder replacement and FTP, SFTP, WebDAV and Amazon s3 client
| Metric | Fetch | ForkLift |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 382 |
| 90-day Installs | 17 | 1.2K |
| 365-day Installs | 71 | 4.7K |
| Version | 5.8.3 | 4.6.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.8K | 189 |
| GitHub Forks | 358 | 204 |
| Open Issues | 121 | 60 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | Shell |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 1, 2014 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Fetch
Fetch is a reliable file transfer client built with Kotlin, designed for developers seeking a robust solution for file downloads. It leverages the best practices from its Android library counterpart, making it a solid choice for developers handling file transfers.
Fetch transfers files efficiently, catering to developers' needs for reliable file downloads.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive Apache-2.0 license, fostering community contribution.
- + Actively maintained with regular updates and a responsive developer team.
- + Relevant and reliable, supported by a strong developer community.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Some open issues, particularly around Android 14 compatibility and file corruption, may affect user experience.
ForkLift
ForkLift is a powerful Finder replacement and file transfer client that supports FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3. It offers a modern interface for file management and syncing with cloud storage, making it ideal for users who need robust file transfer capabilities.
ForkLift acts as a file manager and client for various file transfer protocols, including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3.
Pros
- + Modern Finder replacement with advanced features
- + Supports multiple file transfer protocols
- + Cloud storage integration capabilities
- + Auto-updates keep the software current
- + Active development and maintenance
Cons
- - May have a steep learning curve for new users
- - Occasional bugs reported in the issue tracker