Enclave vs Tunnelblick
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Enclave
6.0Safely build private networks without configs, firewalls or access control lists
Tunnelblick
7.0Free and open-source OpenVPN client
| Metric | Enclave | Tunnelblick |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 1.2K |
| 90-day Installs | 14 | 3.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 79 | 13.6K |
| Version | 2025.6.2 | 8.0.1,6301 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 754 | 3.2K |
| GitHub Forks | 22 | 355 |
| Open Issues | 1 | 62 |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Objective-C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 7y ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | May 19, 2021 | May 21, 2013 |
Reviews
Enclave
Enclave simplifies secure network setup by eliminating the need for complex configurations. It leverages macOS's Secure Enclave for SSH key storage, offering a user-friendly and secure solution for developers managing SSH keys.
Enclave securely stores SSH keys in macOS's Secure Enclave, enabling secure network connections without manual configuration.
Pros
- + Simplifies SSH key management with secure storage in macOS's Secure Enclave
- + User-friendly interface reduces the complexity of network security setup
- + Niche solution ideal for developers needing secure SSH connections
Cons
- - Inactive development since 2019 may compromise security and compatibility
- - Limited community support and adoption
Tunnelblick
Tunnelblick is a reliable, free, and open-source OpenVPN client for macOS, offering users a secure and versatile way to connect to VPN servers. Its long-standing presence and active maintenance make it a trusted choice for those seeking a robust VPN solution.
Tunnelblick allows users to establish secure VPN connections using OpenVPN technology.
Pros
- + Free and open-source, promoting transparency and cost-effectiveness.
- + Long-standing and actively maintained, ensuring reliability and security.
- + Versatile configuration options for various VPN needs.
Cons
- - Historical security vulnerabilities, though addressed, may raise concerns.
- - Complex configuration process for some users.