BloodHound vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
BloodHound
8.0Six Degrees of Domain Admin
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | BloodHound | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 68 | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 167 | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 866 | 47.8K |
| Version | 4.3.1 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 10.6K | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | 1.8K | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | 94 | 2 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PowerShell | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
BloodHound
BloodHound is a powerful tool for analyzing Active Directory relationships, helping users map out domain admin access paths. It's designed for security professionals and red teamers to understand and exploit domain permissions.
BloodHound analyzes Active Directory to map out potential attack paths and relationships within a network.
Pros
- + Powerful and effective for AD analysis and attack path mapping
- + Actively maintained with regular updates and improvements
- + Open-source under GPL-3.0, fostering community contributions
Cons
- - Name confusion with unrelated projects may cause misinformation
- - Manual updates required as auto-updates are not supported
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures