Bitmessage vs Signal
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Bitmessage
6.0P2P communications protocol
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
| Metric | Bitmessage | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2 | 2.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 14 | 9.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 37 | 35.4K |
| Version | 0.6.3.2 | 8.8.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 2.9K | 28.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 578 | 6.7K |
| Open Issues | 221 | 476 |
| License | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Nov 1, 2017 |
Reviews
Bitmessage
Bitmessage is a decentralized, encrypted P2P messaging protocol that ensures privacy by eliminating metadata leaks. It's ideal for users prioritizing security, such as activists and journalists, though it lacks auto-updates and has maintenance concerns.
Enables encrypted, peer-to-peer messaging without relying on centralized servers.
Pros
- + Decentralized and encrypted communication
- + No third-party trust required
- + Open-source with a proven track record
Cons
- - No auto-updates for security patches
- - High number of open issues may affect stability
- - NOASSERTION license poses legal uncertainties
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience