Altair GraphQL Client vs Bruno
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Altair GraphQL Client
8.0GraphQL client
Bruno
8.5Open source IDE for exploring and testing APIs
| Metric | Altair GraphQL Client | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 163 | 5.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 472 | 17.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 2.5K | 88.9K |
| Version | 8.5.0 | 3.3.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 5.4K | 41.6K |
| GitHub Forks | 386 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 51 | 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 17, 2018 | Feb 24, 2023 |
Reviews
Altair GraphQL Client
Altair GraphQL Client is a cross-platform GraphQL client with a user-friendly interface, designed for developers and API teams to explore and test GraphQL APIs effectively. It offers features like query execution, schema exploration, and real-time updates, making it a valuable tool for API development and testing.
Enables users to explore, query, and test GraphQL APIs with a feature-rich client interface.
Pros
- + Cross-platform availability with a consistent user experience
- + User-friendly interface with real-time query execution and schema exploration
- + Support for collaboration through query sharing and team access
Cons
- - Lack of support for custom request headers
- - Manual updates required as auto-updates are not available
Bruno
Bruno is an open-source IDE for exploring and testing APIs, offering a fast and Git-friendly alternative to tools like Postman and Insomnia. It's ideal for developers who value performance, integration with version control, and a lightweight API testing experience.
Bruno provides a platform for developers to explore, test, and document APIs efficiently.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT licensed, offering flexibility and transparency.
- + Git-friendly with support for version control integration.
- + Fast performance and lightweight compared to alternatives.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Strong community support and active development.
Cons
- - A steep learning curve due to its open-source nature.
- - A large number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention.